skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Kussmaul, Christopher A. L."

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract Archean rocks exposed in the Beartooth Mountains, Montana and Wyoming, have experienced a complex >2.5 Gyr thermal history related to the long‐term geodynamic evolution of Laurentia. We constrain this history using “deep‐time” thermochronology, reporting zircon U‐Pb, biotite40Ar/39Ar, and zircon and apatite [U‐Th(‐Sm)]/He results from three transects across the basement‐core of the range. Our central transect yielded a zircon U‐Pb concordia age of 2,805.6 ± 6.4 Ma. Biotite40Ar/39Ar plateau ages from western samples are ≤1,775 ± 27 Ma, while those from samples further east are ≥2,263 ± 76 Ma. Zircon (U‐Th)/He dates span 686.4 ± 11.9 to 13.5 ± 0.3 Ma and show a negative relationship with effective uranium—a proxy for radiation damage. Apatite (U‐Th)/He dates are 109.2 ± 23.9 to 43.6 ± 1.9 Ma and correlate with sample elevation. Multi‐chronometer Bayesian time‐temperature inversions suggest: (a) Cooling between ∼1.90 and ∼1.80 Ga, likely related to Big Sky orogeny thermal effects; (b) Reheating between ∼1.80 Ga and ∼1.35 Ga consistent with Mesoproterozoic burial; (c) Cooling to ≤100°C between Mesoproterozoic and early Paleozoic time, likely reflecting continental erosion; (d) Variable Paleozoic–Jurassic cooling, possibly related to Paleozoic tectonism and/or low eustatic sea level; (e) Rapid Cretaceous–Paleocene cooling, preceding accepted proxies for flat‐slab subduction; (f) Eocene–Miocene reheating consistent with reburial by Cenozoic volcanics and/or sediments; (g) Post‐20 Ma cooling consistent with Neogene development of topographic relief. Our results emphasize the utility of multi‐chronometer thermochronology in recovering complex, non‐monotonic multi‐billion‐year thermal histories. 
    more » « less